In-office procedures, imaging, pathology, pelvic health and infusion all get pitched as growth. A structured way to separate the ones that fit your practice from the ones that fit someone's brochure.
11 min readGrowUrology editorial
In short
What this guide covers · 6 parts
Integrated service lines are the central strategic argument for the independent urology group: keep the episode of care — and its economics — inside the practice rather than exporting it. The argument is sound. It does not follow that every service line is sound for every practice.
Before the capital request, answer five questions in order. If the first one fails, the other four do not matter.
Not "our patients need this". How many of your patients, in the last twelve months, were referred out for this service? Pull the number from your own records. A service line justified by market statistics rather than by your own leakage is a bet on referrals you have not yet earned.
Expected payment per case, less the direct cost of delivering it: consumables, drug or device acquisition where applicable, the incremental clinical staff time, and any per-case technical cost. Contribution margin — not revenue — is the number that has to clear your fixed cost.
Payment varies by payer, by setting and by year. Build the model with your own contracted rates where you have them and clearly-labelled assumptions where you do not, and re-run it when your payer mix shifts.
Fixed cost — equipment, financing, space, dedicated staff, accreditation — divided by contribution per case gives you cases per month to break even. Put that number beside the leakage number from question 1. If break-even requires more cases than your own referral history supports, the plan depends on growth that has to be separately justified.
Ancillary services in physician practices sit inside a body of law and payer policy — physician self-referral rules and their in-office ancillary services exception, supervision requirements, accreditation and licensure, and setting-specific billing rules. These are structural constraints, not paperwork: they can determine whether a service line is permissible in your ownership arrangement at all.
This is the point to involve healthcare counsel, before capital is committed rather than after. The analysis is specific to your entity structure, your state and the service.
New service lines consume clinic rooms, staff attention and physician time. If the model assumes existing staff absorb the work, price that assumption honestly — either as overtime, as an FTE, or as reduced throughput elsewhere. Capacity taken from the main clinic has an opportunity cost, and leaving it out is the most common way a business case flatters itself.
Payback period is an output of the four answers above, not a substitute for them. The Equipment ROI tool will do the arithmetic once you have honest inputs; it cannot rescue dishonest ones.
A structured way to think about the second urologist, the first APP, and the difference between a capacity problem and a demand problem.
10 min readRead
Most start-up plans get the clinical model right and the cash-flow model wrong. A sequenced view of credentialing, capital, capacity and the revenue gap you have to survive.
14 min readRead
Referrals are treated as weather — something that happens to the practice. They are a manageable channel with measurable behaviour, and the practices that manage it grow without buying anything.
9 min readRead
